Search for: "Foster et al v. Holder"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
Notably, the NFTs in this collection grant holders a license for personal and specific commercial use, which has prompted legal debates regarding its scope. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Amicus brief of National Association of Legal Investigators et al. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am
Lamar Smith et al. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Foster v National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:12 pm
SODRAC 2003 Inc., et al. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
A number of the briefs highlighted the recent Wolk v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
Rahman, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
The Internet Association, SIIA et al. brief contains an interesting explanation of how "article of manufacture" must be interpreted differently from a "machine. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)In October 2017 Professor Knox, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment, circulated a Draft Guidelines on Human Rights and the Environment for which he is soliciting views (available here in English, French, Spanish). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:46 pm
American Express Co., et al., No. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:24 pm
Davis … [et al.]. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Examples are US v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in the case Regents of the University of California, et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 10:00 am
Burbank High School Vocal Music Association, et al. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
